Understand your options after an immigration decision — Canada's Immigration Appeal Division and Federal Court judicial review, or the US Board of Immigration Appeals, AAO, and motions — and the deadlines that control everything.
You have a saved session. Pick up where you left off?
There is no single 'immigration appeal.' The remedy depends entirely on what was decided and where. In Canada, many family-sponsorship refusals and some removal orders can be appealed to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD), which can hear new evidence and weigh humanitarian factors — but most temporary and permanent residence refusals instead go to the Federal Court by way of an application for leave and judicial review, which asks only whether the decision was reasonable and fair.
In the US, an immigration judge's removal order is generally appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and a BIA decision can be petitioned to a federal circuit court. USCIS denials may allow an appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO), a motion to reopen or reconsider, or a fresh filing, depending on the form. Consular visa refusals, by contrast, are largely unreviewable and usually require addressing the stated ground and reapplying.
Immigration appeal windows are measured in days and are strictly enforced. Canadian Federal Court judicial review is often 15 days for decisions made in Canada and 60 days for those made abroad; IAD appeals commonly run about 30 days; and the US BIA appeal window is typically 30 days from the immigration judge's decision. The clock usually starts when you receive the decision, which is why keeping proof of the receipt date matters.
A missed deadline frequently ends an otherwise strong case, with only narrow and uncertain exceptions. That is why the very first action after any adverse decision is to confirm the exact deadline and forum — before drafting arguments, gathering evidence, or anything else. If the deadline is imminent, preserving the right to appeal takes priority over perfecting the submission.
Winning grounds are specific, not general. Appeals and judicial review typically succeed on identifiable legal errors, a denial of procedural fairness, or evidence the decision-maker ignored — anchored to the written reasons for decision, not broad dissatisfaction with the outcome. Whether new evidence can help depends on the forum: tribunals like the IAD and US motions to reopen may consider it, while judicial review usually examines only the original record.
These are technical proceedings with irreversible consequences, and removal cases in particular are life-altering. Retaining a licensed immigration lawyer or accredited representative is strongly advised; many offer initial consultations, and nonprofits may assist those who qualify. This tool is educational only — it helps you identify the forum, deadline, and questions to raise, but it is not legal advice and cannot preserve your deadline for you.
Embed this free Appeal Planner wizard on your law firm site — it runs in an iframe and includes a link back to LexScale.ai.
This tool provides general educational information about challenging immigration decisions in the US and Canada, not legal advice. Appeal rights, forums, and deadlines are technical, vary by decision, and are strictly enforced; a missed deadline can end a case permanently. Consult a licensed immigration lawyer or accredited representative immediately after any adverse decision.
Ready to grow your firm with AI?